Legal Opinion
Pinkhasov v. Weaver
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants established a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting the affirmed reports of a neurologist and orthopedist, which were in compliance with CPLR 2106 (cf. Offman v Singh, 27 AD3d 284 [2006]). The doctors reviewed plaintiff’s medical records, examined him and performed detailed and objective tests before concluding that plaintiff had full range of motion in his cervical and lumbar spine. Defendants also submitted plaintiff’s deposition testimony in which he stated that he was only confined to bed for three to four days following the accident (see Copeland v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nelson v. DistantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Offman v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Copeland v. KasalicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Rodriguez v. AbdallahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barry v. AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Blake v. Portexit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Long v. Taida Orchids, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Long v. Taida Orchids, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014