Legal Opinion

United States v. Wei Seng Phua

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided April 17, 2015No. Case No. 2:14-cr-00249-APG-PALPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO REPORTS OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.

The Fourth Amendment protects “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.” U.S. Const, amend. IV. This case tests the boundaries of how far the government can go when creating a subterfuge to access a suspect’s premises. Here, the government disrupted the internet service to the defendant’s hotel room in order to generate a repair call. Government agents then posed as repairmen to gain access to the defendant’s room…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pagan-Gonzalez v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. Pagan-Gonzalez v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. $167,070.00 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API