Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kuhn v. Dell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1965No. 9427Published

1Dissent

McFADDEN,- Justice

(dissenting).

"' It is necessary to point out that by their answer, the appellants, Edward and Monty A. Dell, not only denied negligence on the part of Monty A. Dell, the driver of the Dell vehicle, but further interposed as an affirmative defense to the complaint, that:
“ * * * Floyd E. Kuhn so negligently and carelessly operated plaintiff’s vehicle that there was a collision between plaintiff’s vehicle and defendant Edward Dell’s vehicle; that the. damages, if any, sustained by the said Roland Kuhn were contributed to and proximately caused by the negligence and carelessness…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bullock v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Pilmer v. Boise Traction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API