Legal Opinion
Harmon Paper Co. v. Prager
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 19, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHATEIEED, District Judge.
The plaintiff is the assignee of three patents taken out by one Warren, of which two are involved in this action. All three patents relate to the manufacture of wall paper from wood pulp, and were involved in a suit by this plaintiff against the Kimberly Clark Company, in the Eastern district of Wisconsin, which was tried at the May term of that court, and decided in an opinion dated the 15th day of May, 1922, in favor of the defendant; the court holding all three patents invalid for lack of invention or for unpatentability.
*268The first patent, No. 1,344,570, issued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Dobson v. DornanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re StirlingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- American Merri-Lei Corp. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929