Legal Opinion
Somoza v. Pechnik
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered on or about October 29, 2002, which denied plaintiff Somoza’s motion for partial summary judgment in Action No. 1, and granted the Pechnik plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in Action No. 2 with enforcement stayed pending determination in Action No. 1, unanimously modified, on the law, to vacate the stay in Action No. 2, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
There are several issues of fact in Action No. 1 regarding the stock purchase agreement, the consulting agreement and the promissory notes signed by Somoza,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Banco do Estado de Sao Paulo S.A. v. Mendes Junior International Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Pierre Associates Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- Datwani v. DatwaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Mt. McKinley Insurance v. Corning Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Otto v. OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Fewer v. GFI Group Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- MAP Marine Ltd. v. China Construction Bank Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.