Legal Opinion
Mt. McKinley Insurance v. Corning Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 29, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J.
This is a declaratory judgment action, which arises in the context of mass asbestos liability exposure on the part of Corning Incorporated, brought by two of its insurers, Mt. McKinley *53Insurance Company and Everest Reinsurance Company1 against Corning and other insurers that similarly issued commercial general liability (CGL) policies to Corning. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the policies they issued do not cover, or at most, provide limited coverage with respect to, the asbestos-related bodily injury claims asserted against Corning. Defendant insurers,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Post v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Post v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Fewer v. GFI Group Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Puerto v. DoarNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P.New York Supreme Court · 2013
- Matter of PPDAI Group Sec. Litig.New York Supreme Court · 2019