Dupont v. Randall

RUDMAN, Justice.

George and Frances Randall appeal from the judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Smith, J.) after a jury verdict in their favor.1 The Randalls contend that there was competent evidence to support the verdict. Because we agree with the Superior Court that as a matter of law the plaintiffs were entitled to a verdict in their favor, we affirm the judgment.

This is a boundary dispute. Dupont and the other plaintiffs (hereinafter “Dupont”) are owners of lots in the Rolling Acres subdivision in the town of Etna. The Randalls are an…