Legal Opinion

Aker v. Pearson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 11, 1979PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

In Austin v. Boston Univ. Hosp., 372 Mass. 654, 658 (1977), it was established that every medical malpractice action filed on and after January 1, 1976, is subject to a preliminary hearing by a medical malpractice tribunal conformably with G. L. c. 231, § 60B, inserted by St. 1975, c. 362, § 5. The plaintiff filed his complaint in the instant case on December 22,1975, and, as to the defendants named in that complaint, no tribunal hearing was required. By an amendment to his complaint filed January 27, 1977, the plaintiff joined two additional physicians as defendants. One of these doctors…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Paro v. Longwood HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Little v. RosenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Wadsworth v. Boston Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robert L. Sullivan, D.D.S., P.C. v. BirminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  2. James Ferrera & Sons, Inc. v. SamuelsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Rose Brodie v. Gardner Pierce Nursing & Rest Home, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Herrick v. Essex Regional Retirement BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Hanley v. PolanzakMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API