United Railways & Electric Co. v. Hardesty
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Stockbridge, J.)
1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.
The single question raised on this record is presented by the prayers for instructions to the jury. These are the facts: The appellee, Dr. Hardesty, lived, with his family, at West Arlington. His wife purchased in her own name what is called a twenty trip coupon-book which entitled the person named and those described therein to ride, subject to certain conditions, on the electric railway of the appellant between West Arlington and Baltimore. The coupon-book was issued by the appellant company at a reduced rate. In consideration of the reduced rate the purchaser agreed to comply with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hibbard v. . N.Y. and Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HoeflichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Boylan v. Hot Springs RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BlocherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
- McClure v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garrison v. United Rys. & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1903