Legal Opinion
Norman v. Cummings
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1951No. Files 9109, 9110PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSickel, J.
One of these actions was brought by Robert T. Norman as plaintiff and the other by Clayton Crouse as plaintiff. Walter Cummings and Eastern Clay Products, Incorporated, are defendants in both cases.
On the morning of October 15, 1947, defendant Cummings was driving a light .truck westward out of Belle Fourche on United States Highway Number 212, carrying eleven men, including himself, all employees of the Vinnell Company, Inc., to work in the construction of a bentonite processing plant twenty-one miles west of Belle Fourche in Wyoming. At a point about two and one-half miles west of Belle…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hubbard v. MurraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Sumner County v. Interurban Transp. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- Solberg v. SchlosserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Bruening v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Wallace v. BrendeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zerfas v. AMCO Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Fred Brosnahan v. Western Air Lines, Inc., and Delta Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Snodgrass v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1974
- Syres v. Eastern Clay Products, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Zerfas v. Amco Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015