Legal Opinion
MOYER v. PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 30, 2020No. 5:18-cv-04711Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ CANDACE MOYER, individually and on : behalf of all others similarly situated, : Case No. 5:18-cv-4711-JDW : Plaintiff, : : v. : : PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. : : Defendant. : ____________________________________: MEMORANDUM The question in this case is what a debt collector can say in a debt collection letter, above and beyond what the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act requires, without running afoul of the statute. Defendant Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C. sent a letter to Plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- George Wilson, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Quadramed Corporation, George WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.