Legal Opinion

Kimmel v. Wolf River Drainage District

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1933No. 31,086PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

This appeal was taken by taxpayers from a judgment rendered against them in litigation with a drainage district.

In December, 1929, a petition was presented to the board of county commissioners of Brown county for incorporation of the Wolf River Drainage District. The district was created, and directors were elected. The directors concluded the boundary of the district should be enlarged to include property which would be benefited, and, pursuant to proceedings to that end, the board of county commissioners created the enlarged district.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schur v. Rural High-school District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. Wolf River Drainage District v. NigusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schulenberg v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Babcock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Smith v. City of Prairie VillageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Babcock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Lowden v. NusbaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API