Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Amaral

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1963No. 4599 and 4600PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This is a guest-host case (NRS 41.180) in which the guest Maxwell asks damages from her host Amaral for personal injuries sustained in a one car accident. The claimed basis for the host’s liability is gross negligence. At the close of the case the host moved for a directed verdict (NRCP 50), contending that gross negligence had not been shown as a matter of law. His motion was denied. The lower court reasoned that the issue was one concerning which reasonable minds might differ (Kuser v. Barengo, 70 Nev. 66, 254 P.2d 447; Troop v. Young, 75 Nev. 434, 345 P.2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Antonen v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Armstrong v. OnufrockNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kuser v. BarengoNevada Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Troop v. YoungNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Garland v. GreenspanNevada Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lankford v. IwongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Sagebrush Ltd. v. Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mays v. TodaroNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Volpert v. PapagnaNevada Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API