Johnson v. Interstate Transit Lines
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This cause coming regularly on for hearing before the Court, sitting without a jury, and the Court having heard the evidence and arguments of counsel, does make and enter the following findings of fact:
First. The jurisdiction of the Court is derived through the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, Section 8 thereof.
Second. The Interstate Transit Lines, a corporation, defendant herein, maintains a place of business at Salt Lake City, Utah, within the Central Division of the State and District of Utah.
Third. That on the 9th day of March, 1942, the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Lesher v. P. R. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Doyle v. Division No. 1127 of Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry. & Motor Coach Employees of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1947
- Venzel v. United States Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Daniels v. BarfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947