Legal Opinion

La Mar Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Credit & Commodity Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 26, 1961PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Max J. Wolff, Ref.

This action was tried before me by consent without a jury.

The plaintiff sues upon a written guaranty which reads as follows:

Lamar Sos. Mills. 12-18-58

Lamar, S. C.

Guarantying [sic] $8,500.00 purchased

Stylewise 40 days terms.

Comd. Credit Corp.

New York, N. Y.

The defendant, a New York corporation called Credit and Commodity Corporation (the signature upon the guaranty is somewhat different but it is not disputed that it was intended as defendant’s signature) is a factor.

The evidence at the trial established that Stylewise Sales Corporation (hereinafter called “ Stylewise ”), a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Marks v. . CowdinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. International Text Book Co. v. . ToneNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Rindge v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. Sun Oil Co. v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Nationwide Resources Corp. v. MassabniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co. v. ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Crompton-Richmond Company, Inc., Factors v. James S. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Hillstrom v. GosnayMontana Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API