Legal Opinion

State v. Patterson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1971No. 71-59PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

Prior to trial, counsel for appellant moved for discovery of “all exculpatory evidence contained in the files of the prosecutor or personally known to” him, which counsel had no “way of knowing about.” In support of this motion, counsel cited Brady v. Maryland (1963), 373 U. S. 83. The prosecutor objected, and the trial court, without inquiry, denied the motion. Appellant contends that this ruling denied him due process of law.

Brady, supra, at page 87, holds that “* * * the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SkatzesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rasheem Matthews v. Todd IsheeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. State v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. GreerOhio Supreme Court · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API