Legal Opinion

Watson Ex Rel. Vaughn v. Nichols

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1967No. 770PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

This appeal is from the Superior Court judgment sustaining the demurrer to the cross action. In the cross action, the original defendants alleged, conditionally, that if they are held liable to the plaintiff, then Emory M. and Mary C. Watson, parents of'the infant plaintiff, individually and through their agent, Mitchell Watson, were negligent and primarily liable to the plaintiff by per mitting him to approach the moving mower from behind without notice or warning to James Bradford Nichols, the operator; that the negligence of the additional defendants was primary and any negligence on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Munsert v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Midkiff v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Skinner v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Franco v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. Freeze Ex Rel. Freeze v. CongletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Lee v. Mowett Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Carver v. CarverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API