Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
These eases concern through bills of lading covering cargo for the entire course of shipment, beginning in a foreign, overseas country and continuing to a final, inland destination in the United States. The voyage here included ocean transit followed by transfer to a rail carrier in this country. The Court addressed similar factual circumstances in Norfolk Southern R. Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 543 U. S. 14 (2004). In that case the terms of a through bill were controlled by federal maritime law and by a federal statute known as the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA), note following 46…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S. A. v. M/V Sky ReeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Sompo Japan Insurance Co. of America v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- OneBeacon Insurance v. Haas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Smallwood v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance, PLC v. Ocean World Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.