Legal Opinion

Smith v. Duckworth

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2016No. 14-6201PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Michael DeWayne Smith was charged with two counts of murder for the killings of Sarath Pulluru and Janet Moore. He was convicted and sentenced to death. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed his convictions on direct appeal and denied his two applications for postconviction relief. Mr. Smith sought a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court, arguing, as relevant here, that he is ineligible for the death penalty because he is intellectually disabled, that the state trial court had erred in admitting Mr. Smith’s videotaped confession to the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Wood v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Cuesta-Rodriguez v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. State v. Ford (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Smith v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API