Legal Opinion
Munroop Randhawa v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 30, 2007No. 05-3694PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Munroop Randhawa (“Petitioner”) argues on appeal that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) improperly denied her motion to reconsider a previous BIA decision denying Petitioner’s motion to reopen her removal proceedings as untimely pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Petitioner argues that a previously filed appeal to this Court tolled the time limit for filing her motion to reconsider with the BIA. For the reasons that follow, we DENY the petition for review.
On October 31, 2002, the BIA affirmed the decision of the Immigration Judge, who concluded…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jan M. Sexton Salmi v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Salvador Azarte Celia Castellon v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Viorel Fieran v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barry v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Gor v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Zhao Quan Chen v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Dela Cruz v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Alexander Uritsky v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.