Legal Opinion
State v. Haar
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 1990No. 10833PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
This court filed an opinion April 3, 1990, affirming defendant’s conviction. Defendant filed a motion for rehearing, urging this court to reconsider our decision in light of State v. Wilson, 109 N.M. 541, 787 P.2d 821 (1990). We have done so, and, because we find Wilson distinguishable, we affirm. We withdraw our earlier opinion and substitute this opinion in its place.
Defendant appeals his jury conviction of criminal damage to property over $1,000. He raises five issues on appeal: (1) whether there was substantial evidence that the value of property damaged was at least…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. MaresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.