People v. Hernandez
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
In this case, we must decide whether the improper discharge of a single seated juror during a criminal trial warrants not only a reversal of the ensuing judgment of conviction, but also bars retrial of the defendant on double jeopardy principles. We conclude that, although defendant is entitled to the benefit of a reversal of his conviction by reason of the error in excusing the juror, he is not also immune from reprosecution. As a general rule, the double jeopardy guarantee imposes no limitation on the power to retry a defendant who has succeeded in having his conviction set…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. SeelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. MillbrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. CottleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.