Legal Opinion

GIDDENS v. CURRENTLY UNKNOWN AND UNNAMED SEPTA POLICE OFFICERS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01474Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : NICKEEM GIDDENS, : CIVIL ACTION : : Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 20-cv-01474 : SEPTA OFFICER DETECTIVE : ROBERT STEWART, et al. : : Defendants. : : MEMORANDUM OPINION Goldberg, J. July 22, 2021 Plaintiff Nickeem Giddens brings claims pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Pennsylvania state law, stemming from his alleged unlawful arrest, imprisonment, and prosecution by Defendant Officer Detective Robert Stewart of the Southeastern Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) police department and unnamed SEPTA police officers…

2Cases cited36 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.