Legal Opinion
People v. Perez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 6, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
We affirm. Initially, inasmuch as the record before us does not indicate that defendant moved to withdraw his plea or sought to vacate the judgment of conviction, “he has failed to preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution premised on County Court’s alleged failure to make an adequate inquiry concerning his claim of self-defense” (People v Simpson, 19 AD3d 945, 945 [2005]; see People v Richardson, 275 AD2d 864, 865 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 937 [2000]) and his claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Gomez, 72 AD3d 1337, 1337 [2010]).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. CarstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015