Legal Opinion
Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation v. Darrell Nielsen, D/B/A Nielsen Warehouse Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1971No. 647-70_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERR, District Judge.
This diversity action stems out of indemnity provisions included in a Bill of Sale between Southern Pacific Transportation Company, 1 as Seller, and Darrell Nielsen, as Buyer.
The controversial provisions of the Bill of Sale provide:
“7. Buyer agrees to reimburse Railroad the cost to Railroad * * * for performing any work deemed necessary, in the judgment of Railroad, to protect and safeguard property, * * * of Railroad while Buyer is performing the work contemplated by the terms and provisions of this indenture.
“8. Buyer hereby * * * agrees to indemnify and save harmless…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- W. C. Case v. Dan C. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Union Pacific Railroad v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
- Alamo Lumber Company v. Warren Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Titan Steel Corp. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert J. Ihrke and Mary E. Ihrke v. Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Eli Trujillo v. Uniroyal Corporation, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Keen v. Detroit Diesel AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Pacific Indemnity Company v. Broward County, and Florida Airmotive Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Kansas City Power & Light Company v. United Telephone Company of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.