Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. v. Tepper

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 30, 2009No. SC07-2428PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWells, J.

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance seeks review of the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. v. Tepper, 969 So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Dominion of Canada v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 754 So.2d 852 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), on a question of law. We have jurisdiction, see art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const., and we approve the Fifth District’s decision in Metropolitan.

This case involves interpretation of section 627.727, Florida Statutes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach ErosionSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. Joshua v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. State v. GoodeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Trinidad v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Lyantie Townsend, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. Diaz-Hernandez v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. MARLYN TRACEY v. WELLS FARGO BANK N. A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API