Legal Opinion

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 16, 2013No. SC11-2513PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPariente, J.

Petitioner Raymond James Financial Services required its clients (the investors) to sign an agreement to arbitrate all disputes arising out of the handling of their investments. The issue in this case is not the validity of the arbitration agreement, but rather whether Florida’s statute of limitations that is applicable to a “civil action or proceeding” applies to arbitration proceedings. The investors assert that the statute of limitations applies only to judicial actions and thus did not limit the time in which to bring their arbitration claims, and the Second District Court of Appeal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Heart of Adoptions, Inc. v. JASupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ronald Williams v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. FenykCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. Citizens Property Insurance Corp., etc. v. Perdido Sun Condominium Association, Inc., etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2015
  5. William R. Crews v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API