Legal Opinion

Linke v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1982No. Appeal, No. 1789 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

In the instant case, the Claimant,1 seeks a remand because the referee failed to comply with Part VI of 34 Pa. Code §101.21(a) which requires the referee to give an unrepresented claimant certain instructions regarding his rights. In Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Baord of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427, 430 A.2d 354 (1981), we held that such an omission on the referee’s part required a remand. Our review of the record here indicates that the referee did not give the Claimant the required instructions.

The Commonwealth and Claimant’s employer2 by an amicus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Robinson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Katz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Snow v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayberry v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Schuster v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Finley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API