Legal Opinion

Fordham v. Oldroyd

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2007No. 20060260Published

1Opinion of the Court

171 P.3d 411 (2007)

2007 UT 74

Richard G. FORDHAM, Plaintiff and Petitioner,

v.

Ryan OLDROYD, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 20060260.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 14, 2007.

Rehearing Denied October 31, 2007.

Peter C. Collins, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

Aaron Alma Nelson, Salt Lake City, for defendant.

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals.

NEHRING, Justice:

¶ 1 This case calls on us to consider for the first time whether Utah recognizes a professional rescuer[1] rule that stakes its claim to legitimacy in its tie to sound public policy. We conclude that such a rule properly occupies a place…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. University of Denver v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Maltman v. SauerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gibson v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API