State Ex Rel. Brontrager v. Mundy
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBiedzbll, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and the interveners herein. The action is against the defendants as principal and sureties upon a warehouseman’s bond. Counsel for the appellants have very properly limited the questions for consideration on. appeal, so that an extended statement of the facts is not called for. The bond was evidently given, as the complaint declares, for the purpose of obtaining for the defendant J. G. AL'undy a state warehouse license which would enable him to operate a warehouse for buying, selling, storing, shipping and handling grain at Umbria in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
3Cited by14 opinions
- Newman Signs, Inc. v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Talbott v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Ethen v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- United States v. TylerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.