Terex Corp. v. Hough
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[T1] This is an appeal from the district court's dismissal of a wrongful death action based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We conclude that, at the time the district court ruled on the motions before it, it did have subject matter jurisdiction, and we, therefore, reverse.1 In doing so, we *319overrule our previous holding in Makinen v. PM P.C., 893 P.2d 1149 (Wyo.1995).
ISSUES
[¶ 2] The appellant, Terex Corporation (Terex), states the issues as:
1. Are the District Court's Findings, Conclusions and Order concerning Plaintiffs initial effort to file a wrongful death case…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Clark v. PacificorpWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Rodriguez v. CaseyWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- White v. FisherWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Gookin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hoke v. Motel 6 JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Scherer v. Schuler Custom Homes Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Interest of RB, State of Wyoming, By and Through the Office of the Park County Attorney v. Wyoming State Hospital and RBWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Bridle Bit Ranch Co. v. Basin Electric Power CooperativeWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Action Bailbonds v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.