Legal Opinion

In Re Floyd

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1954No. Crim. 5602Published

1Opinion of the Court

43 Cal.2d 379 (1954)

In re DENZEL LEE FLOYD on Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 5602.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Aug. 31, 1954.

Joseph K. Robbins for Petitioner.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Chief Assistant Attorney General, G. A. Strader, Deputy Attorney General, James Don Keller, District Attorney (San Diego), and Olney R. Thorn, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

S. Ernest Roll, District Attorney (Los Angeles), and Harold O. Pressman, Deputy District Attorney, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

SPENCE, J.

Petitioner seeks through habeas corpus his release…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. In Re FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re SusmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API