Legal Opinion

Dilbeck v. Ideal Bread Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1978No. 8555PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Appellants sued appellees for damages arising from an automobile-truck collision. Trial was to a jury and upon receipt of answers to certain special issues the trial court entered judgment that appellants take nothing. Appellants contend they are entitled to a new trial because the jury answers were not unanimous, and being less than unanimous, the verdict was required to be signed by each juror in accordance with the provisions of Tex.R.Civ.P. 292.

The record consists of only a partial transcript and a statement of facts containing the evidence produced on the hearing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Security State Bank and Trust v. CraigheadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Barker v. Weingarten Riverside Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Jones v. Square Deal Cab CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Laybourn v. Bray ShiffletCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Otis Spunkmeyer, Inc. v. Blakely, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  2. Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Pate v. Texline Feed Mills, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
  4. Faulk v. Bluitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  5. Isaac Faulk & Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Co. v. Collie Bluitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API