William Bracy and Roger Collins v. James Schomig and Roger Cowan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1DissentIlana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge
Five years ago, I argued that Bracy and Collins ought to be given the chance to conduct discovery in an effort to marshal evidence that Judge Maloney’s serial bribe-taking had an impact on their trial. “If their discovery proves fruitless,” I said, “we can at least take comfort in the knowledge that we have given them every opportunity to prove that Maloney’s corruption deprived them of a fair trial.” Bracy v. Gramley, 81 F.3d 684, 699 (7th Cir.1996) (dissent), rev’d in part, 520 U.S. 899, 117 S.Ct. 1793, 138 L.Ed.2d 97 (1997). The petitioners have now had their chance at discovery. If proof…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Daniel P. Taglia and Robert J. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.