Legal Opinion
Houghton v. Grier
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1912No. 1555PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error from Oklahoma County Court; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action by D. W. Grier against H. B. Houghton. Judgment for plaintiff; and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
Specifications of error 1, 2, 3, and 4, as urged by plaintiff in error, require an examination and consideration of the testimony of the various witnesses. Counsel has failed to comply with Rule 25 (20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) of this court, which provides that:
“Where a party complains on account of the admission or rejection of testimony, he shall set out in his brief the full sub stance of the testimony to the admission or rejection of which he objects, stating specifically his objections thereto. * * * Abstracts shall be indexed and shall refer to the pages of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Shawnee v. SlankardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Seaver v. RulisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Reynolds v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Arnold v. IdikerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Red Ball Transfer & Storage Co. v. DeloeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re French's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Carson v. FrenchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915