Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Idiker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 1047PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Tulsa County Court; N. J. Gubser, Judge. Action by E. M. Arnold- against Henry Idiker. From the judgment, Arnold brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Rule 25 (20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) of this court is in part as follows:

“The brief of the plaintiff in error in all cases except felonies shall contain an abstract or abridgment of the transcript, setting forth the material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts and documents upon which he relies, together with such other statements from the record as are necessary to a full understanding of the questions presented to this court for decision, so that no examination of the record itself need be made in this court.”

The brief of the plaintiff in error wholly fails to comply with this rule.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tiger v. CokerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Davis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Houghton v. GrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API