State v. Willey
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLynn, J.
I agree with the majority opinion that the defendant’s conviction should be upheld. I would also uphold the sentence imposed, however, because I believe the trial court sustainably exercised its discretion in considering the defendant’s post-offense conduct and testimony at trial, as they are reasonably related to the purposes of sentencing. Therefore, I respectfully dissent as to the portion of the opinion vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing.
The majority relies on three factors in asserting that a remand for resentencing is required: (1) the majority’s inability to conclude…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.