State v. Lyle
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Following a court trial, appellant Michael James Lyle was convicted of driving with an alcohol concentration of over .10 within five years of a previous similar conviction in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subds. 1(a) and 3(a) (1986).
On appeal, Lyle claims that the record fails to show a sufficient factual basis for his prior uncounseled guilty plea and that enhancement of the current charge to a gross misdemeanor based on that prior un-counseled plea was improper. We agree, and reverse and remand the matter for resentencing as a misdemeanor. 1 .
FACTS
On August 24,1986,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. GouletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. HoaglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Kelsey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Lundin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Maurion Jameal Travis v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Juanel Anthony MikulakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016