Moncier v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Justice.
Daniel Dewayne Moncier appeals his conviction of burglary of a habitation. In three grounds of error he contends: (1) the only witness connecting him to the offense was an accomplice witness as a matter of law, and that her uncorroborated testimony was inadmissible, (2) the submission to the jury during the punishment stage of the trial, over his timely objection, of whether a deadly weapon was used or exhibited during the commission of the offense violated due process because the indictment contained no allegation of a deadly weapon, and, (3) that there was no evidence to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Moncier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.