Legal Opinion

Moncier v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 14, 1986No. 05-84-01189-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

Daniel Dewayne Moncier appeals his conviction of burglary of a habitation. In three grounds of error he contends: (1) the only witness connecting him to the offense was an accomplice witness as a matter of law, and that her uncorroborated testimony was inadmissible, (2) the submission to the jury during the punishment stage of the trial, over his timely objection, of whether a deadly weapon was used or exhibited during the commission of the offense violated due process because the indictment contained no allegation of a deadly weapon, and, (3) that there was no evidence to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Moncier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API