Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Constancio

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1974No. Crim. 7394PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, J.

Defendants Helen Vallesteros and Gail Constancio were jointly tried and convicted by jury of possession of heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350). Additionally, the jury convicted defendant Constancio of possession of amphetamines (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350) and possession of paraphernalia for the use of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364). Defendants contend that the search which produced evidence essential to their convictions was unlawful and that they did not receive effective assistance of counsel. Our review of the record and the applicable law…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. GasteloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. TalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. People v. BravoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. People v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. State v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API