Oredson v. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Society
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
After favorable verdict in an action upon a life insurance policy, the trial judge, relying upon Bratley v. Brotherhood of Am. Yeomen, 159 Minn, 14, 198 N. W. 128, granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Despite evidence which showed that the soliciting agent had full knowledge that the application contained false answers, the trial judge was of the view that the cited case precluded this knowledge from being the knowledge of the defendant. The beneficiary appeals from the judgment.
As indicated, certain questions contained in decedent’s application…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Shaughnessy v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Mattson v. SamaritansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- La Due v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Zimmerman v. Bankers Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949