Legal Opinion

Western Wheeled Scraper Co. v. McMillen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1904No. 13,497PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Thomas county: James N. Raul, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, 0.

Plaintiff in error brought suit against the defendants in error npon three promissory notes, all in the following-form:

“$84. Ti-iedfoRD, Nebraska, November 20,1893.
“One year after date we promise to pay to the Western Wheeled Scraper Company, or order, at Thedford Bank of Thedford, Nebraska, eighty-four and no-100 dollars, with interest- at seven per cent, per annum, payable annually, for value received, and if action is commenced hereon, attorney’s fees for collection. (Sign officially.)
“J. M. McMillen,
“G- W. Miller,
“G-. L. Matthews,
“Directors of Thedford Irrigation & Power Go.
“…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andres v. KridlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Keidan v. WinegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Webster v. WrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Western Wheeled Scraper Co. v. SticklemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LINCOLN EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. EvelandNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. G. E. Conkey Co. v. BochmannDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963
  3. Prudential Insurance v. BlissNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API