Legal Opinion

United States v. Victor Contreras

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 31, 1985No. 240, Docket 85-1295PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Circuit Judge:

Section 3142(e) of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3141 et seq. (Act), provides that a rebuttable presumption arises that no condition or combination of conditions can assure the appearance of the defendant or the safety of the community if “the judicial officer finds that there is probable cause to believe that the person committed an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act” (emphasis added.) The question presented here is whether the judicial officer must hold an evidentiary hearing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Gerald SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API