Legal Opinion

Heath v. Joyce

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 30, 1974No. 6853PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

This is the second occasion that this personal injury action has been before the court on a motion for new trial. On the first trial, suit was initiated by both Jane Heath and her husband who was the driver of one of the vehicles involved. A jury verdict was rendered for the defendant as against Jane Heath, but this court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial due to error in the trial court’s instruction to the jury Heath v. Joyce, 111 N.H. 309, 282 A.2d 668 (1971). Upon retrial in February 1973, a jury returned a verdict of $40,000 for Jane Heath. Based on exceptions taken during the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. L'Esperance v. SherburneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  2. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  3. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  4. Valliere v. FilfaltSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Hill v. Bardis Fruit Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gates v. RosenogleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Brigham v. Hudson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  4. Gintzler v. MelnickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. State v. AnctilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API