Legal Opinion

Kizer v. Hazelett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1943No. 27,875PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRlCHMAN, J.

Appellee was injured in a collision between an automobile owned and driven by appellant Kizer and an automobile owned and driven by her son, appellant Hazelett, in which she was riding as a guest. She sued both appellants in one paragraph alleging that Kizer’s negligence and her son’s willful and wanton misconduct concurred in causing her injuries without fault on her part. Each appellant filed a motion to separate the causes of action and redocket and try the same as separate causes of action which motions were overruled and errors are assigned on the rulings. The cause was tried by a jury…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HilligossIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Brannen v. Kokomo, Greentown & Jerome Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Boonville National Bank v. BlakeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Jackson v. Record, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoesel v. Cain Kahler v. CainIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Jessop v. Werner Transportation Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. McKeown v. CalusaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Thompson v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Kapson v. KubathDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API