Legal Opinion

City of High Shoals v. Vulcan Materials Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1992No. 9127SC176Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff presents three assignments of error to this Court on appeal. Plaintiff does not address its second assignment of error in its brief; therefore, it is deemed abandoned. N.C.R. App. P., Rule 28. In its remaining assignments, plaintiff first contends the trial court erred in granting Vulcan summary judgment on the ground that the forecast of evidence presented raised a genuine issue of fact as to whether Vulcan’s quarrying activity was prohibited by a zoning ordinance enacted by plaintiffs city council in 1973. Plaintiff further contends the trial court erred in granting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Overstreet v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API