Legal Opinion

Overstreet v. City of Raleigh

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1985No. 8410SC1036PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment, barring plaintiffs’ action to quiet title as a matter of law. We find no error.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). It is a drastic remedy, not to be granted “unless it is perfectly clear that no issue of fact is involved and inquiry into the facts is not desirable to clarify the application of the law.” Dendy v. Watkins, 288 N.C. 447, 452, 219 S.E. 2d 214, 217 (1975). The burden is on the moving party to establish the lack of any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dendy v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Spector United Employees Credit Union v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Leciejewski v. SedlakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Killion v. MeeksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Marshall v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  3. Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. Barrington & Jones Law Firm, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA INC. v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. City of High Shoals v. Vulcan Materials Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API