Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1967No. S. F. 22495PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

In this proceeding for a writ of prohibition we adjudicate, for the first time in this state, the question whether the People may pursue an appeal from an order dismissing an accusatory pleading under section 995 of the Penal Code and, while that appeal is pending, file a new pleading charging the same offense and proceed to trial on the second pleading. For reasons stated hereinafter, we conclude that although the People may simultaneously file an appeal from the dimissal of the first pleading and seek a new accusation, they should be required to elect between these two courses of action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. France v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. SonoquiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. HelsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. SaezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Irvin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Irvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API