Legal Opinion

Torres v. Diaz

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 24, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01964Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDUARDO TORRES, Case No.: 19-cv-01964-LAB-JLB 12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 13 v. MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS 14 RALPH DIAZ, et al., 15 Respondents. [ECF Nos. 2; 3; 4; 5; 13; 18] 16 17 Petitioner Eduardo Torres is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 on a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 (ECF Nos. 1; 9.) Presently before the Court are several miscellaneous motions filed by 20 Petitioner: (1) Request for Evidentiary Hearing (ECF…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Vernon C. Weygandt v. Donald Look, Superintendent, and the Attorney General for the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API