Yde v. State

I respectfully dissent from the decision reached in this case. I agree that so long as Thoresen v. State, Me., 239 A.2d 654 (1968) retains vitality, it controls the decision in this case.. I would overrule Thoresen and the case which expressly reaffirmed it.1

*470Though there may not be a remedy for every wrong,

“Maine and its people always endeavor to do exact justice under and according to the Constitution and the common and statutory law.” Dwyer v. State, 151 Me. 382, 394, 120 A.2d 276, 283 (1956).

The existing interpretation of 14 M.R. S.A. § 55022 (post-conviction habeas corpus) as decided by…